there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

propensity within someone

i want to do that too

bro i read nothing in my life

yeah

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

ahnaf abrar

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

that looks like my instagram account

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

all that is to say

isaac

i understand

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we can only engage in such a way

ion

i love it here

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

like first name

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

is this you as well

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

god being the centre magnet

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

lol yea

currently

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.