okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
not their contents
so the method has to be autonomous
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
you cannot feed someone truth
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
we can only engage in such a way
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so an active mazelike process
magnetisation/form
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
all that is to say
as in
much more tactility
but really the thing should be autonomous
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine