autonomy of learning

and the fake qualifier

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so at the end

idk

fw

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

hello reader,

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah

not so on: yvf(wthw)

we can only engage in such a way

...

god being the centre magnet

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

isaac newton

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

isaac

wait what is that

bro i read nothing in my life

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books