mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
was it worth it
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
ahnaf abrar
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i was tempted to lie about my name
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
plato
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
plato
so the method has to be autonomous
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
have you read
its good
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
feel you
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
as in
we can only engage in such a way
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
magnetises a pin
not their contents
is this you as well
its performative
god being the centre magnet
Thank you, Jack
bro i read nothing in my life
yeah