there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.

Rain, starting

Worse Lift

Windrush Art Kid Oligarch

no longer writing in the third person

i see a website

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?

really i want the internet

yes

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

autonomy of learning

its good

i love it here

it is hopeful

feel you

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

was it worth it

i really havent

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

brb i will read and reply sincerely

bro i read nothing in my life

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it