magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

whats your name?

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

lol

abrar?

have you read

is this you as well

division of reality is straying away from it

we can only engage in such a way

no i haven't really read anything

its good

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

magnetisation/form

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

bro i read nothing in my life

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

god being the centre magnet

i understand

feel you

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

plato

was it worth it

or never left

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

no like which do people call me

so an active mazelike process

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i want to do that too

we need to be deconstructing our identities