whats your name?
lol
abrar?
have you read
is this you as well
division of reality is straying away from it
we can only engage in such a way
no i haven't really read anything
its good
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
magnetisation/form
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
god being the centre magnet
i understand
feel you
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
plato
was it worth it
or never left
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
no like which do people call me
so an active mazelike process
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i want to do that too
we need to be deconstructing our identities