no like which do people call me
so an active mazelike process
so the method has to be autonomous
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
god being the centre magnet
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
have you read
its performative
idk
division of reality is straying away from it
propensity within someone
lol
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
what do you mean
ahnaf abrar
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
is this you as well
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i want to do that too
no i haven't really read anything
its good
we can only engage in such a way
you cannot feed someone truth
isaac newton
bro i read nothing in my life
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
yes
we need to be deconstructing our identities