there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
idk
not their contents
we can only engage in such a way
or never left
magnetisation/form
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
lol
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
hello reader,
your feed looks like my tumblr
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
bro i read nothing in my life
much more tactility
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
autonomy of learning
yeah
...
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
wait what is that
...