He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
all that is to say
propensity within someone
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
we can only engage in such a way
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
its good
i dont understand magnetisation
whats your name?
you cannot feed someone truth
ion
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
kind of mythopoesis
Better Lift
abrar?
yeah
what do you mean
isaac
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content