.png)
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03
lol
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
or never left
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
lol yea
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.
i have read not even 1 book
not their contents
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
the site i am dreaming
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
but really the thing should be autonomous
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
not so on: yvf(wthw)
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation