After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
magnetisation/form
propensity within someone
and the fake qualifier
not their contents
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
so an active mazelike process
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so the method has to be autonomous
autonomy of learning
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
you cannot feed someone truth
send your tumblr
plato
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
we need to be deconstructing our identities
its performative
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
have you read
its good
is this you as well
division of reality is straying away from it
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it