i really havent

2 (actually index). two is company


i have read not even 1 book

as in

hello reader,

so the method has to be autonomous

and the fake qualifier

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting


was it worth it


mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

part of an old note. It will get lighter.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given


i am quite illiterate on producing technology

wait what is that

but i respect your search

i love it here

magnetises a pin