way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
hello reader,
what do you mean
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
i really havent
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
autonomy of learning
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
we can only engage in such a way
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
not so on: yvf(wthw)
so the method has to be autonomous
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
...
its performative
propensity within someone
bro i read nothing in my life
magnetisation/form
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
division of reality is straying away from it
i have read not even 1 book
plato
and the fake qualifier
not their contents