way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

hello reader,

what do you mean

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

i really havent

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book


ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

autonomy of learning

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

we can only engage in such a way

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class


not so on: yvf(wthw)


so the method has to be autonomous

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

...

its performative

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

propensity within someone

bro i read nothing in my life

magnetisation/form

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

division of reality is straying away from it

i have read not even 1 book

plato

and the fake qualifier

not their contents

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.