i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
i was tempted to lie about my name
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i really havent
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
was it worth it
like first name
and the fake qualifier
plato
what do you think my name is
so the method has to be autonomous
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
its performative
which magnetises chains of pins
not their contents
division of reality is straying away from it
i have read not even 1 book
yeah
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
isaac
isaac newton
as in
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
ion
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
Today I felt like starting
i really havent
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine