my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
or never left
we can only engage in such a way
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
its good short few pages
send your tumblr
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
like magnets
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
which magnetises chains of pins
ion
thank you
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
isaac
no i haven't really read anything
magnetises a pin
was it worth it
propensity within someone
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.i dont understand magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
as in
its performative
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
much more tactility
send link
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
December 2025