Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?

i understand

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

so the method has to be autonomous

really i want the internet

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

division of reality is straying away from it

autonomy of learning

we can only engage in such a way

as in

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

magnetisation/form

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

"Put a blanket."

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

the site i am dreaming

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

much more tactility

December 2025

so an active mazelike process

Garden Post-Dusk, Birds Above, In Another Life

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

bro i read nothing in my life

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

send link