i understand

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

like magnets

plato

idk

and the fake qualifier

its performative

i dont understand magnetisation

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

yeah

no like which do people call me

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

all that is to say

as in

its good

lol

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

what do you mean

but really the thing should be autonomous

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i love it here