i love it here
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
fw
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
lol
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
autonomy of learning
plato
i dont understand magnetisation
ahnaf abrar
no like which do people call me
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i have read not even 1 book
what do you think my name is
lol yea
its good
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
ion
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
have you read
bro i read nothing in my life
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
feel you
and the fake qualifier
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
we can only engage in such a way
its good
thank you
what do you mean
all that is to say
is everyoneback on tumblr now