mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
not their contents
all that is to say
isaac
i understand
thank you
so the method has to be autonomous
what do you mean
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
its good short few pages
idk
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
have you read
is everyoneback on tumblr now
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
much more tactility
which magnetises chains of pins
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
its performative