there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not their contents
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
and the fake qualifier
plato
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
its good
autonomy of learning
what do you think my name is
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
not so on: yvf(wthw)
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
we can only engage in such a way
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
...
i really havent
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
really i want the internet
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt