idk
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
autonomy of learning
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
as in
i dont understand magnetisation
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
isaac
its good
or never left
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good short few pages
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
lol
send your tumblr
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."
lol yea
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
you have a beautiful account btw
"Put a blanket."
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
yeah
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models