nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
magnetisation/form
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i dont understand magnetisation
you cannot feed someone truth
its good
like first name
so the method has to be autonomous
sorry i am texting like a slav
i want to do that too
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
have you read
is this you as well
i love it here
much more tactility
its good
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
abrar?
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
propensity within someone
was it worth it
we can only engage in such a way
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so an active mazelike process
ion
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate