mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

barren land

so the method has to be autonomous

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

much more tactility

that looks like my instagram account

so at the end

ahnaf abrar

all that is to say

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i dont understand magnetisation

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i love it here

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

like first name

have you read

is this you as well

feel you

no i haven't really read anything

yes

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

but i respect your search

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

no like which do people call me

god being the centre magnet

but really the thing should be autonomous