and the fake qualifier

i have read not even 1 book

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

magnetisation/form

idk

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

not their contents

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so the method has to be autonomous

propensity within someone

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

yeah

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

autonomy of learning

no like which do people call me

we need to be deconstructing our identities

you cannot feed someone truth

send your tumblr

lol

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

Worse Lift

"Put a blanket."

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i want to do that too

like magnets

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

isaac

ahnaf abrar

feel you

the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.

barren land

no longer writing in the third person