there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation/form
so the method has to be autonomous
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
all that is to say
its performative
lol yea
not their contents
idk
so at the end
we can only engage in such a way
fw
propensity within someone
as in
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
isaac newton
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
what do you mean
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15
so an active mazelike process
We look out over the river to a block of luxury flats built on the site of some old docks. It would be nice to live right there. Yes.
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you