so at the end

is this you as well

not their contents

much more tactility

fw

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

what do you mean

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

its performative

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

and the fake qualifier

and the fake qualifier

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

you cannot feed someone truth

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

its good

is everyoneback on tumblr now

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ion

lol

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

its good

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i dont understand magnetisation

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak


Slug

no i haven't really read anything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

whats your name?

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book