so at the end
idk
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
all that is to say
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
plato
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
and the fake qualifier
so an active mazelike process
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
sorry i am texting like a slav
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
...
thank you
as in
its performative
magnetisation/form
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
autonomy of learning
your feed looks like my tumblr
plato
whats your name?
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
we want to live the knowledge too live the content