fw
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
magnetisation/form
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
idk
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
was it worth it
what do you think my name is
you cannot feed someone truth
we need to be deconstructing our identities
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i really havent
We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.
so at the end
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
thank you
bro i read nothing in my life
but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos
abrar?
god being the centre magnet