so at the end

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

abrar?

plato

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you think my name is

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

what do you mean

whats your name?

i understand

so the method has to be autonomous

hiding from the rain

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

magnetises a pin

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

much more tactility

idk

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

barren land

and the fake qualifier

we need to be deconstructing our identities

its good

ion

feel you