god being the centre magnet

magnetisation/form

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

its performative

sorry i am texting like a slav

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

was it worth it

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

not their contents

so the method has to be autonomous

its good

what do you mean

bro i read nothing in my life

what do you think my name is

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

as in

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

or never left

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i really havent

your feed looks like my tumblr

yeah

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

abrar?

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so an active mazelike process

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

no like which do people call me