bro i read nothing in my life

so the method has to be autonomous

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

as in

autonomy of learning

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

all that is to say

its performative

we can only engage in such a way

its good

you cannot feed someone truth

like magnets

plato

no i haven't really read anything

what do you mean

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

its good

have you read

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

its good short few pages

feel you

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

propensity within someone

abrar?

plato

2 (actually index). two is company

like first name

i want to do that too

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

hello reader,