in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

isaac newton

lol

plato

like magnets

as in

propensity within someone

no like which do people call me

yeah

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

your feed looks like my tumblr

was it worth it

so the method has to be autonomous

much more tactility

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

what do you think my name is

no i haven't really read anything

you cannot feed someone truth

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

or never left

so an active mazelike process

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

and the fake qualifier

December 2025

...

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we can only engage in such a way