there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
or never left
so an active mazelike process
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
isaac
its good
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
barren land
what do you mean
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
have you read
division of reality is straying away from it
yeah
its good short few pages
as in
so at the end
so the method has to be autonomous
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
autonomy of learning
thank you
which magnetises chains of pins
ahnaf abrar
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books