idk

propensity within someone

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

all that is to say

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its performative

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

we can only engage in such a way

plato

like magnets

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

which magnetises chains of pins

i love it here

yeah

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

thank you

so the method has to be autonomous

ion

you have a beautiful account btw

no i haven't really read anything

magnetisation/form

"Put a blanket."
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

Thank you, Jack

i want to do that too

sorry i am texting like a slav

abrar?

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?

Better Lift

division of reality is straying away from it