and the fake qualifier

lol

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

so an active mazelike process

idk

i have read not even 1 book

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

that looks like my instagram account

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

the site i am dreaming

magnetisation/form

2 (actually index). two is company

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

...

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

or never left

13, H, grate

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then