...

much more tactility

abrar?

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

plato

or never left

lol

so the method has to be autonomous

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

I Write Goodbye Letter

i really havent

...

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

wait what is that

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

i want to do that too

no like which do people call me

yeah

is this you as well

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

2 (actually index). two is company

i dont understand magnetisation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.