mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
propensity within someone
magnetisation/form
no like which do people call me
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
i am quite illiterate on producing technology
was it worth it
yeah
as in
like first name
and the fake qualifier
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
abrar?
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
really i want the internet
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.but really the thing should be autonomous
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate