there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

idk

like first name

i was tempted to lie about my name

like magnets

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

not their contents

what do you think my name is

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

feel you

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i love it here

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

so the method has to be autonomous

so at the end

sorry i am texting like a slav

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

bro i read nothing in my life

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

magnetisation/form

i dont understand magnetisation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

so an active mazelike process

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

what do you mean

we can only engage in such a way

which magnetises chains of pins

no like which do people call me

propensity within someone

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

plato

thank you

i really havent

autonomy of learning

its good