its performative

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so the method has to be autonomous

isaac

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

you cannot feed someone truth

much more tactility

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

ion

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

have you read

no i haven't really read anything

we can only engage in such a way

its good

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

bro i read nothing in my life

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i really havent

i understand

plato

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

sorry i am texting like a slav

so at the end

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

IWGD

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

like first name