way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not their contents
division of reality is straying away from it
all that is to say
i really havent
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
plato
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
magnetises a pin
its performative
thank you
which magnetises chains of pins
god being the centre magnet
that looks like my instagram account
so the method has to be autonomous
what do you mean
was it worth it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
no like which do people call me
like magnets
lol
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
much more tactility
we can only engage in such a way
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
ahnaf abrar
autonomy of learning
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
magnetisation/form
abrar?
yeah
isaac
bro i read nothing in my life