okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

isaac

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

its performative

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

its good short few pages

no i haven't really read anything

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

division of reality is straying away from it

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like first name

thank you

autonomy of learning

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

have you read

magnetises a pin

and the fake qualifier

magnetisation/form

i was tempted to lie about my name

all that is to say

i love it here

i really havent

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i dont understand magnetisation

i want to do that too

i understand

ion

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

abrar?

no like which do people call me

yeah