...
i understand
like magnets
you cannot feed someone truth
was it worth it
isaac
its performative
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
so the method has to be autonomous
have you read
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
propensity within someone
sorry i am texting like a slav
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
division of reality is straying away from it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos