think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
so an active mazelike process
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
all that is to say
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i dont understand magnetisation
have you read
so the method has to be autonomous
which magnetises chains of pins
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like magnets
much more tactility
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.
its performative
its good short few pages
propensity within someone
ion
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
plato
you have a beautiful account btw
and the fake qualifier