there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

so at the end

so the method has to be autonomous

sorry i am texting like a slav

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i want to do that too

isaac newton

i love it here

ion

its good short few pages

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

was it worth it

...

send link

its good

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

yeah

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

wait what is that

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

...

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

Can I see

i understand