what do you mean
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
idk
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so an active mazelike process
its performative
so the method has to be autonomous
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
much more tactility
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
propensity within someone
magnetisation/form
you cannot feed someone truth
that looks like my instagram account
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
autonomy of learning
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i have read not even 1 book
its good short few pages
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
yeah
whats your name?
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
but really the thing should be autonomous
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
it is hopeful
send your tumblr
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
the site i am dreaming
hello reader,