magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
its good short few pages
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
we can only engage in such a way
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
what do you think my name is
not their contents
i love it here
all that is to say
i was tempted to lie about my name
we need to be deconstructing our identities
its performative
plato
i want to do that too
no i haven't really read anything
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
like magnets
autonomy of learning
its good
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
whats your name?
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.
lol
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
no longer writing in the third person
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book