so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

not their contents

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

your feed looks like my tumblr

or never left

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

division of reality is straying away from it

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

magnetisation/form

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

Can I see

i have read not even 1 book

fw

so at the end

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

barren land

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

its performative

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.