like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone truth
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
autonomy of learning
its good short few pages
like first name
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
not their contents
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so at the end
which magnetises chains of pins
barren land
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
so the method has to be autonomous
like magnets
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
is everyoneback on tumblr now
its good
whats your name?
in a post. I want to be remembered
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:11:24