i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
all that is to say
autonomy of learning
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
not their contents
sorry i am texting like a slav
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
plato
its good
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
i dont understand magnetisation
kind of mythopoesis
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
whats your name?
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation