there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

its good

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

idk

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone truth

as in

much more tactility

Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?

ion

or never left

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

feel you

is this you as well

no i haven't really read anything

and the fake qualifier

Lift Analysis

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

we can only engage in such a way

plato

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

magnetisation/form

what do you think my name is

the site i am dreaming

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

I Write Goodbye Letter